Rules of the Road for Using Experts in International Arbitration

, Corporate Counsel

   | 1 Comments

The parties often have the burden and opportunity to fashion rules concerning the use of experts that fit the needs of the dispute.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Continue to Lexis Advance®

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

What's being said

  • Adrian Lifely, Osborne Clarke LLP, London

    Thanks Gil, an interesting and informative piece. To add complexity, arbitral tribunals from different jurisdictions have different expectations wrt party-appointed experts. To provide a very broad-brush caricature: - in the US experts tend to associate quite closely with their party‘s case and will seek to argue that case - in the UK experts must be and be seen to be independent of the parties - such that they should not advance arguments they don‘t believe in and should concede points where they think the opponent is right - in Europe and many civil law jurisdictions, the same independence is certainly expected and parties need to know that Tribunals are actually quite sceptical about the value of witness evidence in general, with the result that if an expert is considered to be partisan he/she is likely to be disregarded by the Tribunal and ineffective. Therefore, one needs to take notice of the legal and cultural backgrounds of the arbitrators when deciding how to use experts. Many thanks Adrian

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202775280225

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.