Free Speech Defense Fails for Ratings Firms in Suit Over Collapsed Investment Vehicle

, The American Lawyer


Credit-rating agencies have long turned to the First Amendment to fend off suits over promoting securities that turn out to be not so credit worthy. But that defense didn't completely hold up Wednesday when a federal judge ruled the protection does not apply when a "rating agency has disseminated their ratings to a select group of investors rather than to the public at large." The case involves a $5.86 billion structured investment vehicle that collapsed when the true value of the asset behind its notes became clear.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Continue to Lexis Advance®

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202433582756

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.